翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Mills Peak (South Georgia) ・ Mills Pond District (St. James, New York) ・ Mills Prairie, Illinois ・ Mills ratio ・ Mills Reservation ・ Mills River (North Carolina) ・ Mills River Chapel ・ Mills River, North Carolina ・ Mills Sisters ・ Mills Township ・ Mills Township, Bond County, Illinois ・ Mills Township, Michigan ・ Mills Township, Midland County, Michigan ・ Mills Township, Ogemaw County, Michigan ・ Mills University Studies High School ・ Mills v R ・ Mills v United Building Soc ・ Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia ・ Mills Valley ・ Mills Watson ・ Mills' constant ・ Mills' Row ・ Mills, Kentucky ・ Mills, Nebraska ・ Mills, New Mexico ・ Mills, Utah ・ Mills, Wyoming ・ Mills-Hale-Owen Blocks ・ Mills-Screven Plantation ・ Mills-Stebbins Villa Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Mills v R ： ウィキペディア英語版 Mills v R ''Mills v R'', () 1 S.C.R. 863 is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada concerning the right to a trial within a reasonable time under section 11(b) of the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms'' and the meaning of a "court of competent jurisdiction" under section 24(1) of the ''Charter''. The Court held that a thirty-one month delay was not unreasonable in the circumstances and that preliminary hearing judges are not within jurisdiction, superior courts can sometimes be within jurisdiction, and criminal trial courts were always within jurisdiction. ==Background== For a period starting in 1973 James Mills was arrested and charged several times for robbery. In 1979 he was arrested in Nova Scotia with several outstanding charges. He was moved to London, Ontario to deal with some past charges. He did not appear in court until September 1981. There were a number of requests for adjournment. Eventually, the ''Charter'' came into force in April 1982. In May Mills made a motion for a stay of proceedings on the basis that it violated his right to be tried in a reasonable time under section 11(b) of the ''Charter''. The motions judge held that it was not a "court of competent jurisdiction" under section 24(1) and that even if it was the ''Charter'' could not apply retroactively to remedy violations that occurred before the enactment of the ''Charter. Both the Superior Court of Ontario and Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed the motion. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Mills v R」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.